The US government is reconsidering a landmark rule requiring nearly all new cars and trucks to have advanced automatic emergency braking systems, citing technical challenges and industry concerns.
US Government Considers Repeal of Mandatory Automatic Emergency Braking System
The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) has announced that it is reconsidering a landmark rule requiring nearly all new cars and trucks in the US to have advanced automatic emergency braking systems by 2029.
Challenges in Implementing the Rule
Automakers have expressed concerns about the feasibility of implementing such a rule, citing technical challenges and the need for further research. The Alliance for Automotive Innovation, representing General Motors, Toyota Motor, Volkswagen, and other automakers, has filed a lawsuit to block the rule, arguing that it is “practically impossible with available technology.” The group claims that the requirement for vehicles to be able to stop and avoid striking vehicles in front of them at speeds of up to 62 miles per hour (100 kph) is unrealistic.
Background on the Rule
The NHTSA introduced the rule as part of the 2021 infrastructure law, which directed the agency to establish minimum-performance standards for automatic emergency braking systems. In 2016, 20 automakers voluntarily agreed to make automatic emergency braking standard on nearly all US vehicles by 2022. By late 2023, all 20 had equipped at least 95% of their vehicles with the braking systems.
Impact and Criticism
Proponents of the rule argue that it will save lives and prevent injuries. According to NHTSA estimates, the rule will save at least 360 lives annually and prevent at least 24,000 injuries as traffic deaths spiked after the pandemic. Critics, however, note that there is no way to ensure effectiveness without government regulations.
Delay in Implementation
The Trump administration has announced a delay in the implementation of the rule, pushing back its effective date from January 1, 2029, to March 20, 2029. This gives the new administration time to further review the regulation and consider alternative approaches.
