As high-stakes nuclear negotiations between the US and Iran get underway, the two sides face differing objectives that could determine the outcome of the talks.
The United States and Iran are set to begin high-stakes talks over Tehran’s nuclear program, with the two sides facing differing objectives that could determine the outcome of the negotiations.
In 2018, the Trump administration pulled the US out of a 2015 nuclear pact between Iran and six world powers, including the EU. This decision was met with widespread criticism, but Trump argued that it would allow him to strike a better deal with Iran.
Since then, the US has pursued a policy of ‘maximum pressure’ to increase limits on Iran’s nuclear program, reimposing stringent sanctions and slapping more penalties on Iranian entities supporting its nuclear activities.
Iran initially rejected direct negotiations with Washington, but Trump announced in March that he would engage in talks with Iranian officials. However, the tone of the negotiations has been tense, with Trump warning that if Iran refuses to strike a deal, ‘it will be bombing like you’ve never seen before.’
In response, an adviser to Iran’s supreme leader threatened to expel UN nuclear inspectors, which the US warned against, saying it would lead to escalation.
The format of the talks has been unclear, with both sides expressing cautious optimism. Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi and US Middle East envoy Steve Witkoff will lead the negotiations in Oman, but the details of the discussions remain shrouded in uncertainty.
One key issue at stake is Iran’s refusal to limit its missile program or fully dismantle its nuclear capabilities. This has been a point of contention between the two sides, with Washington pushing for more stringent limits and Tehran insisting on maintaining some level of flexibility.
The talks are also being watched closely by Israel, which has demanded full denuclearization of Iranian territory. However, analysts say that Tehran is unlikely to accept this demand.
As the negotiations get underway, it remains to be seen whether they will yield a deal or lead to further tensions between the two sides.
