As de-extinction claims gain traction, concerns over ethics and consequences grow: Can private companies truly act in the best interests of society when their financial backing is at stake?
The De-Extinction Industry: A Growing Concern
Private companies are making bold claims about reviving extinct species, but at what cost? Colossal Biosciences’s recent announcement of ‘resurrecting‘ the dire wolf is just the latest example of this trend.
The dire wolf (Aenocyon dirus) was a large canine species that roamed North America during the Late Pleistocene era.
It is estimated to have lived between 250,000 to 11,700 years ago.
Dire wolves were highly social animals, often living in packs with complex hierarchies.
They preyed upon bison, camels, and other large herbivores.
Fossil records suggest that dire wolves went extinct at the end of the last Ice Age, likely due to climate change and loss of prey species.
The Rise of Wealth and Influence in Science
In a focus group I recently conducted, participants expressed their trust in individuals who are wealthy. This response may seem surprising, but it highlights a pressing issue: how do we balance scientific progress with public interest? When those making claims have significant financial backing, can we truly say they’re acting in the best interests of society?

The Dire Wolf De-Extinction Controversy
Colossal Biosciences, valued at over $10 billion, has sparked debate about de-extinction efforts. While some may view this as a groundbreaking achievement, others are concerned about the ethics and consequences of playing with nature. But is the dire wolf truly ‘resurrected‘, or is this just a clever marketing ploy?
A Growing Industry with Unclear Consequences
The recent news cycle has seen a surge in de-extinction claims from various companies. From dodo de-extinction to woolly mammoth revival, it’s clear that these efforts are gaining traction. However, we need to carefully consider the implications of such endeavors. Are we truly ready for the responsibilities that come with reviving extinct species?
The de-extinction industry involves the use of genetic engineering and biotechnology to revive extinct species.
This concept has been around since the 1970s, but recent advancements in technology have made it more feasible.
Scientists are exploring ways to bring back woolly mammoths, 'passenger pigeons', and even the dodo bird.
However, this raises concerns about the ethics of playing God with nature.
Proponents argue that de-extinction can help restore ecosystems and promote biodiversity.
Critics counter that it may disrupt natural selection and potentially harm native species.
- newscientist.com | Why claims about resurrecting dire wolves are the tip of the iceberg